tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [PATCH] ham/chirp update

Ottavio Caruso <> writes:

> What you say makes sense in principle, but in the case of chirp,
> upstream have decided they are going to release their packages as
> chirp-daily. I think the OP's approach probably makes more sense.
> From:
> "you do not need to worry about finding a stable version to run. You
> should always be on the latest build available."

I didn't mean to say we should definitel not package their snapshots.

But still, at:

the latest news is "0.4.1 is released".  So upstream should resolve
their inconsistency issues.

I still think we should call it chirp-devel, so as not to pretend that
upstream follows release norms when they do not.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index