Re: Switch vulnerable packages to a warning only

[Jason Bacon <outpaddling%yahoo.com@localhost>]

On 2020-05-21 11:46, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 04:34:19PM +0000, coypu%sdf.org@localhost wrote:
> > It's somewhat unnecessary to have ALLW_VULNERABLE_PACKAGES?=yes (any
> > value except no, even empty, would do), but this is probably easier to
> > understand.
> It makes a difference whether auditing is done at all or if the result
> is ignored. Namely on whether the non-existance of the vulnerability
> file is an error. So if anything, it should be a trinary option (yes,
> no, warn).
>
> Joerg
+1