Re: PKG_DEVELOPER=yes [Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/lang/zig]

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost> writes:

> I wouldn't go so far to say that we disagree, but I think we are drawing
> somewhat different lines. We certainly seem to agree on running bulk
> builds with PKG_DEVELOPER is a good idea :)
>
>> But I think everybody agrees that we can and should cause inexpesnive,
>> no-additonal-dependency checks currently only enabled in PKG_DEVELOPER
>> to be always enabled.  Correct?
>
> Sure, that seems to be uncontested.

OK - then I think Jonathan should feel free to promote these checks to
always, and that will make progress.