Re: Concensus on PKGSRC_FORTRAN?=gfortran?

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Jason Bacon <outpaddling%yahoo.com@localhost> writes:

> I think the only thing to watch out for is people using platforms
> where the gcc packages don't build, but some of their builds require
> Fortran.  As long as g95 is still available, we'd only be forcing them
> to override a default, though, not taking away their ability to
> function.

And, we can leave OS/version/platform combinations at g95, when we know
that's better.

Is this a theoretical concern, or an actual known problem?