tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Does mozilla-rootcerts-openssl need to be unconditionally NOT_FOR_UNPRIVILEGED?

To: Jason Bacon <outpaddling%yahoo.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: Does mozilla-rootcerts-openssl need to be unconditionally NOT_FOR_UNPRIVILEGED?
From: Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:44:19 -0400

Jason Bacon <outpaddling%yahoo.com@localhost> writes:

> It seems to me that the unprivileged install is only needed to install
> in /etc, which only happens if using builtin openssl.

I ran this by dholland (MAINTAINER) offlist and got an ok, so I just
committed it.  Thanks for bringing this up.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does mozilla-rootcerts-openssl need to be unconditionally NOT_FOR_UNPRIVILEGED?
  - From: Jason Bacon

References:
- Does mozilla-rootcerts-openssl need to be unconditionally NOT_FOR_UNPRIVILEGED?
  - From: Jason Bacon

Prev by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Next by Date: Re: Does mozilla-rootcerts-openssl need to be unconditionally NOT_FOR_UNPRIVILEGED?
Previous by Thread: Re: Does mozilla-rootcerts-openssl need to be unconditionally NOT_FOR_UNPRIVILEGED?
Next by Thread: Re: Does mozilla-rootcerts-openssl need to be unconditionally NOT_FOR_UNPRIVILEGED?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index