tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Writing buildlink files: optional dependencies?

To: tech-pkg%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Writing buildlink files: optional dependencies?
From: Edgar Fuß <ef%math.uni-bonn.de@localhost>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:29:24 +0200

> There is support for this. Look at e.g. gtk3/buildlink3.mk for an example.
Ah, great, thanks!

> You'll have to take care of that manually (and might need to bump ABI
> if the dependencies change).
Is there a rule to put certain comments in the options.mk file that will 
advise someone updating the dependencies?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Writing buildlink files: optional dependencies?
  - From: Thomas Klausner

References:
- Writing buildlink files: optional dependencies?
  - From: Edgar Fuß
- Re: Writing buildlink files: optional dependencies?
  - From: Thomas Klausner

Prev by Date: Re: Writing buildlink files: optional dependencies?
Next by Date: Re: Writing buildlink files: references to ../mk/foo.buildlink3.mk
Previous by Thread: Re: Writing buildlink files: optional dependencies?
Next by Thread: Re: Writing buildlink files: optional dependencies?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index