Re: Can we make gfortran the default Fortran?

To: tech-pkg <tech-pkg%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Can we make gfortran the default Fortran?
From: David Holland <dholland-pkgtech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 20:50:34 +0000

On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 09:36:20PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
 > > The big issue is libstdc++, not libgcc.
 > 
 > In the case of g95, the problem is actually libgcc_s.

So what's the solution then? An ELF binary linked against two
incompatible versions of shared libgcc will never fully work.

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can we make gfortran the default Fortran?
  - From: coypu
- Re: Can we make gfortran the default Fortran?
  - From: Jason Bacon

References:
- Re: Can we make gfortran the default Fortran?
  - From: Jason Bacon
- Re: Can we make gfortran the default Fortran?
  - From: Jason Bacon
- Re: Can we make gfortran the default Fortran?
  - From: David Holland
- Re: Can we make gfortran the default Fortran?
  - From: coypu
- Re: Can we make gfortran the default Fortran?
  - From: David Holland
- Re: Can we make gfortran the default Fortran?
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: Can we make gfortran the default Fortran?
Next by Date: Re: glibmm build issues with gcc 4.8
Previous by Thread: Re: Can we make gfortran the default Fortran?
Next by Thread: Re: Can we make gfortran the default Fortran?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index