[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Selecting a C++ compiler
On 10/11/17 03:12, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
+1 for simplicity. I prefer to expose problems and force a proper
solution over trying to cleverly work around them.
* On 2017-10-11 at 01:34 BST, Greg Troxel wrote:
Or to fail hard if c++11 is in USE_LANGUAGES and < 5.1?
Not < 5.1, I've been very happily using 4.9 for our SmartOS builds for
a long time with no obvious issues, and this would screw me over.
However, I think I'm of the opinion that we should just fail hard if
an insufficient compiler is detected. If compiler/gcc.mk has taught
me anything it's that it is vastly over-complicated and a nightmare to
maintain. Adding another layer of complexity and magic on top is just
going to make things worse.
I'd prefer we simply abort, tell the user to choose a decent compiler
for all C++ packages, then let them sort things out based on those
requirements and any local preferences they may have.
Earth is a beta site.
Main Index |
Thread Index |