Re: ld wrapper and -(no-)whole-archive

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:17:12PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:07:42PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 08:41:20PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:23:20PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > > How can we fix this ? Is there a way to disable cwrappers for a package ?
> > > 
> > > Can we please just stop blaming cwrappers every time something strange
> > > happens? Especially since it doesn't have do reordering without explicit
> > > instructions to do?
> > 
> > Can you please explain ?
> > I see that the order of arguments passed to the wrapper ld, and the arguments
> > passed to the real ld are not in the same order. And I've no idea why.
> 
> Because that's what the *old* wrappers are doing.

Indeed, it looks like with my 2016Q4 I was using the C wrapper, and with
2017Q1 I'm back to the shell one.

Isn't 2017Q1 supposed to use the C wrappers too ?

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--