Re: gfortran

[Patrick Welche <prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost>]

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 05:51:05PM +0000, coypu%SDF.ORG@localhost wrote:
> Now in -current it does not :-)
> Rin Okuyama asked for the same.

Essentially "me too"

https://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-users/2016/07/20/msg023551.html

must try now...

On the fortran front, I remember being unable to build octave and
needing to set PKGSRC_FORTRAN=gfortran as a work around. Last time
around, it seems the opposite was true. Building octave, blas etc
with the default g95 was all that worked.


P