Re: wrappers and gcc -isystem

[Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%joyent.com@localhost>]

* On 2016-02-18 at 10:31 GMT, Thomas Klausner wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:22:46AM +0000, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
> > Your patch only handles legacy wrappers, not cwrappers which is
> > necessary for fast (bulk) builds.  If you can come up with a patch
> > which handles cwrappers too (which would be required for integration
> > anyway) then I'd be happy to test it.
> 
> As long as cwrappers is not enabled by default[1], I don't think this
> should be a requirement for patches to be accepted.
>  Thomas
> 
> [1] What's keeping this, anyway?

I don't know but I'd like to see it happen 12 months ago.  The
difference in reduced build/system time is astonishing and I've used
it for all my builds for a long time now.

The sooner we can kill legacy wrappers the better.

-- 
Jonathan Perkin  -  Joyent, Inc.  -  www.joyent.com