tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: bulk-small and jpeg



On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 04:33:33PM +0100, Richard Palo wrote:
> I'd like to propose the following modification to deal with environments
> having selected 'libjpeg-turbo' instead of 'jpeg':
> > richard@omnis:/home/richard/src/pkgsrc/meta-pkgs/bulk-small$ git diff master .
> > diff --git a/meta-pkgs/bulk-small/Makefile b/meta-pkgs/bulk-small/Makefile
> > index f8fa4d2..2fe5a8c 100644
> > --- a/meta-pkgs/bulk-small/Makefile
> > +++ b/meta-pkgs/bulk-small/Makefile
> > @@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ BUILD_DEPENDS+=     readline-[0-9]*:../../devel/readline
> >  BUILD_DEPENDS+=        zlib-[0-9]*:../../devel/zlib
> >  BUILD_DEPENDS+=        gd-[0-9]*:../../graphics/gd
> >  BUILD_DEPENDS+=        giflib-[0-9]*:../../graphics/giflib
> > -BUILD_DEPENDS+=        jpeg-[0-9]*:../../graphics/jpeg
> > +.include "../../mk/jpeg.buildlink3.mk"
> > +BUILDLINK_DEPMETHOD.${JPEG_DEFAULT}=   build
> >  BUILD_DEPENDS+=        png-[0-9]*:../../graphics/png
> >  BUILD_DEPENDS+=        tiff-[0-9]*:../../graphics/tiff
> >  BUILD_DEPENDS+=        gnutls-[0-9]*:../../security/gnutls
> 
> is it correct to assume that the DISTNAME should become bulk-small-201512xx 
> to indicate the date of the change or can a simple PKGREVISION bump suffice?

For packages where we control the version number, like this one, just
bump the version. PKGREVISION is for those where we don't.
 Thomas


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index