tech-pkg archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: bulk-small and jpeg
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 04:33:33PM +0100, Richard Palo wrote:
> I'd like to propose the following modification to deal with environments
> having selected 'libjpeg-turbo' instead of 'jpeg':
> > richard@omnis:/home/richard/src/pkgsrc/meta-pkgs/bulk-small$ git diff master .
> > diff --git a/meta-pkgs/bulk-small/Makefile b/meta-pkgs/bulk-small/Makefile
> > index f8fa4d2..2fe5a8c 100644
> > --- a/meta-pkgs/bulk-small/Makefile
> > +++ b/meta-pkgs/bulk-small/Makefile
> > @@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ BUILD_DEPENDS+= readline-[0-9]*:../../devel/readline
> > BUILD_DEPENDS+= zlib-[0-9]*:../../devel/zlib
> > BUILD_DEPENDS+= gd-[0-9]*:../../graphics/gd
> > BUILD_DEPENDS+= giflib-[0-9]*:../../graphics/giflib
> > -BUILD_DEPENDS+= jpeg-[0-9]*:../../graphics/jpeg
> > +.include "../../mk/jpeg.buildlink3.mk"
> > +BUILDLINK_DEPMETHOD.${JPEG_DEFAULT}= build
> > BUILD_DEPENDS+= png-[0-9]*:../../graphics/png
> > BUILD_DEPENDS+= tiff-[0-9]*:../../graphics/tiff
> > BUILD_DEPENDS+= gnutls-[0-9]*:../../security/gnutls
>
> is it correct to assume that the DISTNAME should become bulk-small-201512xx
> to indicate the date of the change or can a simple PKGREVISION bump suffice?
For packages where we control the version number, like this one, just
bump the version. PKGREVISION is for those where we don't.
Thomas
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index