Re: libsmi license: esdl-license -- Free or not?

To: Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: libsmi license: esdl-license -- Free or not?
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 14:05:23 +0100

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 07:48:35PM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
> So, I think we should either:
> 
>   Hold our nose and declare esdl-license close enough to ISC that we
>   move it to esdl and put it in DEFAULT_ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES.
> 
>   Add esdl because of Debian DFSG approval.
> 
>   Drop libsmi as a dependency for Free packages.

The latter (for now) + push upstream to get their stupid license OSI/FSF
approved?

Martin

References:
- libsmi license: esdl-license -- Free or not?
  - From: Greg Troxel

Prev by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Next by Date: Re: Update py-yenc to 0.4.0
Previous by Thread: libsmi license: esdl-license -- Free or not?
Next by Thread: py-yenc 0.3 package works
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index