Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/lang/gcc5

[Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%joyent.com@localhost>]

* On 2015-07-25 at 23:07 BST, David Holland wrote:

> My thought for the time being is that we should have lang/gcc51 and
> lang/gcc52, and if by the time 5.3 appears it's clear that keeping
> them all around isn't useful, we can rearrange then. Or when 5.4
> appears, or whatever.

Given they've changed the default libstdc++ ABI in 5.2 I'm in strong
agreement with this, as there is clearly no way the 5.X updates can be
considered to be equivalent to 4.N.X updates.

-- 
Jonathan Perkin  -  Joyent, Inc.  -  www.joyent.com