Thanks. It sounds like evidence tends towards amarok-kde3 being appropriate to delete, especially if no one speaks up. > - Would amarok-kde3 be a candidate for deletion in its own right? ?? Sorry, what I meant was: Suppose there were no issue about ruby, but that one was looking around pkgsrc for packages that are dead upstream and probably have no users. Would amarok-kde3 be such a package? Thanks for answering my queries. I don't have any objection to you proceeding as you proposed. I'm really asking because I think the questions I asked should be part of any removal discussion; usually the proposer knows the answers, but others don't.
Attachment:
pgpghPs_xhTdY.pgp
Description: PGP signature