Re: Building error in graphics/p5-PerlMagick

["D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 23:21:51 +0200
Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:
> For PerlMagick, the following scenario is not probable, but for other
> packages it could happen that A depends on B which pulls in C (which A
> also needs) but at some point B stops depending on C. That'd break A
> then. So we try to include all direct dependencies directly.

Right.  So are you saying that it is OK to include it directly in
graphics/p5-PerlMagick then?

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy%NetBSD.org@localhost>
http://www.NetBSD.org/ IM:darcy%Vex.Net@localhost