Re: binary pkg "variants" ? [was: Re: Package split or package options?]

To: Anthony Mallet <tho%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: binary pkg "variants" ? [was: Re: Package split or package options?]
From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 11:19:48 +0200

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:58:18AM +0200, Anthony Mallet wrote:
> The first two patches are unrelated to options and are just code
> refactoring. Maybe I can just commit these for now?
> 
> http://www.netbsd.org/~tho/0001-pkgtools-pkg_install-Factorize-code-adding-a-version.patch
> http://www.netbsd.org/~tho/0002-pkgtools-pkg_install-Do-not-reinvent-pkg_match-for-m.patch

Fine with me.
 Thomas

References:
- Package split or package options?
  - From: Edgar Fuß
- Re: Package split or package options?
  - From: Jonathan Perkin
- Re: Package split or package options?
  - From: David Holland
- binary pkg "variants" ? [was: Re: Package split or package options?]
  - From: Fredrik Pettai
- binary pkg "variants" ? [was: Re: Package split or package options?]
  - From: Anthony Mallet
- binary pkg "variants" ? [was: Re: Package split or package options?]
  - From: Anthony Mallet
- Re: binary pkg "variants" ? [was: Re: Package split or package options?]
  - From: Thomas Klausner
- Re: binary pkg "variants" ? [was: Re: Package split or package options?]
  - From: Alistair Crooks
- Re: binary pkg "variants" ? [was: Re: Package split or package options?]
  - From: Anthony Mallet

Prev by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Next by Date: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/lang/gfortran
Previous by Thread: Re: binary pkg "variants" ? [was: Re: Package split or package options?]
Next by Thread: Re: [meiwaku] binary pkg "variants" ?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index