[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Package split or package options?
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:02:25 +0100
From: Edgar =?iso-8859-1?B?RnXf?= <ef%math.uni-bonn.de@localhost>
So, should I use package options controlling which of the three (or four)
components gets built (less overhead, less likely to accidently install
a client, but no server) or split it into three packages plus a
nss-pam-ldapd/Makefile.common (better for binary packages)?
Please split it into separate packages. That way, after I have done
my bulk build and partially deployed some packages, I don't need to
restart from the beginning when I realize I wanted to add a different
feature -- I just have to run pkg_add.
Main Index |
Thread Index |