Re: any objections to adding -D_PTHREADS in mk/pthread.builtin.mk and pthread.buildlink.mk

["OBATA Akio" <obache%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:05:20 +0900, Martin Husemann 
<martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 08:36:59AM +0200, Richard PALO wrote:
> > >@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ BUILDLINK_LDFLAGS.pthread=    # empty
> > > # XXX
> > > # XXX This should really be a check for GCC!
> > > # XXX
> > >-BUILDLINK_OPSYS_SUPPORT_PTHREAD=       DragonFly FreeBSD Linux MirBSD
> > >NetBSD OpenBSD
> > >+BUILDLINK_OPSYS_SUPPORT_PTHREAD=       DragonFly FreeBSD Linux MirBSD
> > >NetBSD OpenBSD SunOS
> > > .    if !empty(BUILDLINK_OPSYS_SUPPORT_PTHREAD:M${OPSYS})
> > > BUILDLINK_CFLAGS.pthread+=     -pthread
> > > BUILDLINK_LDFLAGS.pthread+=    -pthread
> >
> >
> > OKAY?
>
> Sounds good to me. Maybe the XXX should now be addressed as well? Joerg?

`-pthreads' for GCC and `-mt -lpthread' for SunPro on Solaris?

--
OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost