tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Does ncurses really need to depend on groff and ghostscript?

To: tech-pkg%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Does ncurses really need to depend on groff and ghostscript?
From: Paul Ackersviller <pda%sdf.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:42:13 +0000

Another area in current pkgsrc on HP-UX 11.31 I'm having trouble
with is ncurses, but really only because of ghostscript.  That may
be another subject (it seems to GNU linker options hard-coded,
while I only have HP's), but I'd sware ncurses didn't have this many
dependencies a year or two ago.  Is there a better workaround for
this than going back to older pkgsrc?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does ncurses really need to depend on groff and ghostscript?
  - From: OBATA Akio

Prev by Date: Is there some good reason for taking gdbm out of python build?
Next by Date: Re: Is there some good reason for taking gdbm out of python build?
Previous by Thread: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Next by Thread: Re: Does ncurses really need to depend on groff and ghostscript?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index