[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Why adding unconditional dependency on tradcpp? (Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/net/tightvnc)
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:32:53PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 21:15:36 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger
> <joerg%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> >Log Message:
> >Always use tradcpp. Fix prototypes. Bump revision.
> You are doing such changes (Always use tradcpp) for not a little packages,
> whereas I have ever no problem before.
> Then, why not do it as conditionally (for broken situation for you)?
I think the idea is that packages needing a traditional cpp work with
gcc, but not with many other compilers including clang.
When using tradcpp, it will work with all compilers, still including
So it improves the general situation, and there is not particular
reason to restrict it to some compilers.
At least that's how I understood it.
Main Index |
Thread Index |