Re: Preserving ancient GCCs?

[Ignatios Souvatzis <is%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:52:06PM +0400, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
> Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> writes:
> 
> > is there a good reason for keeping lang/gcc and lang/gcc3?
> 
> Yes, there exists software that requires varargs, which entails using
> gcc 2.95 for development.

Couldn't that be rewritten to stdarg? I did this with some package
10 years ago...

        -is
-- 
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/