[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: mit license is ambiguous
> If an upstream software developer says her or his code is licensed
> under one license (MIT for example) and we list it as being licensed
> under another license (expat or x11 for example), I think it might
> cause more confusion.
Not any more confusion than we already have now with things like
postfix-license == IBM Public License v1.0, png license == zlib, etc.
Main Index |
Thread Index |