Re: mit license is ambiguous

To: tech-pkg%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: mit license is ambiguous
From: rodent%NetBSD.org@localhost
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 22:41:46 -0400

> If an upstream software developer says her or his code is licensed
> under one license (MIT for example) and we list it as being licensed
> under another license (expat or x11 for example), I think it might
> cause more confusion.

Not any more confusion than we already have now with things like
postfix-license == IBM Public License v1.0, png license == zlib, etc.

Prev by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Next by Date: Re: PKGSRC_PHASE
Previous by Thread: Re: mit license is ambiguous
Next by Thread: Re: mit license is ambiguous
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index