Re: Capability mismatch between gettext-lib and gettext-tools

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 08:35:38PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:16:37 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger 
> <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:13:52PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> >>On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:59:56 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger 
> >><joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:57:01PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> >>>>Proposed patch.
> >>>>You can use current behavior with _TOOLS_USE_PKGSRC.msgfmt=no.
> >>>
> >>>You have inverted at least the comment about when using msgfmt from
> >>>pkgsrc vs builtin gettext.
> >>
> >>Not inverted, update condition flexibility.
> >
> >New:
> >+# If we're using the builtin gettext implementation, then we should
> >+# definitely be using the pkgsrc version of msgfmt (gettext-tools).
> >
> >Old:
> >-# If we're not using the builtin gettext implementation, then we should
> >-# definitely be using the pkgsrc version of msgfmt (gettext-tools).
> 
> Here are a simple patch for you.
> Just bump required version of gettext-lib and gettext-tools.

So, do we really want to force every NetBSD user to install
gettext-tools? I don't like that...

Joerg