Am 23.01.2013 20:29 schrieb "Aleksej Saushev" <asau%inbox.ru@localhost>:
> > That is nonsense, especially since all of the bulk tools are perfectly
> > capable of building "all packages" on their own.
> So what's the point of introduction of the same thing in a "poor-man's" way?
Exactly. This is why we don't have bulk-all.
Other than that, I am not sure that I get your point. You iterated several times that you think these bulk packages are a bad idea. What is it that you propose instead?