Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)

To: John Marino <netbsd%marino.st@localhost>
Subject: Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
From: David Holland <dholland-pkgtech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:24:16 +0000

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:52:01PM +0200, John Marino wrote:
 > >devel/florist
 > >
 > >I believe the conclusion during the last freeze was that this should
 > >be removed.
 > 
 > I don't object to just removing this package, but this particular
 > one was on my to-do list to upgrade to the latest version.

For ada stuff you're the boss, I think :-)
-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- 2012Q1 failing packages (on netbsd-current)
  - From: David Holland
- Re: 2012Q1 failing packages (on netbsd-current)
  - From: Thomas Klausner
- long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
  - From: David Holland
- Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
  - From: OBATA Akio
- Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
  - From: David Holland
- Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
  - From: John Marino

Prev by Date: Re: print/okular
Next by Date: Re: 2012Q1 failing packages (on netbsd-current)
Previous by Thread: Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
Next by Thread: Re: long-broken packages (some are removal candidates)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index