tech-pkg archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: bsdtar, pkg_install and archivers/xz
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 02:36:37PM +1300, Steven Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:53:38PM +1300, Steven Drake wrote:
> > > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 08:51:47PM +1300, Steven Drake wrote:
> > > > > So I think archivers/xz should be treated the same and distributed in
> > > > > its
> > > > > files directory. I have the changes to xz, bsdtar and pkg_install
> > > > > tested
> > > > > and ready to commit.
> > > >
> > > > I don't think so. zlib is primarily handled like that because it is the
> > > > default compression scheme. bzip2 for historic reasons. I don't think XZ
> > > > has to be threated as such.
> > >
> > > In that case do you have any problems with adding '--without-lzma' to
> > > libarchive's configure arguments in bsdtar and pkg_install?
> >
> > Yes, I have. What's wrong with picking it up if it is present in the
> > base system?
>
> Nothing if PREFER.xz == "native", I'm taking about when its "pkgsrc", in
> which case one of the two options should be used. So which one?
>
> BTW, your the one who setup this behavior in both bsdtar and pkg_install.
Both are self-contained binaries, they don't link against anything
(else) in ${PREFIX}. The intention is to maximize functionality without
sacrificing this property.
Joerg
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index