Re: compound depends

[Aleksey Cheusov <cheusov%tut.by@localhost>]

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:46 PM, OBATA Akio <obache%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:40:19 +0900, Alistair Crooks 
> <agc%pkgsrc.org@localhost> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:24:25PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:37:55 +0900, David Holland
>>> <dholland-pkgtech%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
>> And I'd prefer to keep the individual
>> inequalities as simple as possible, in general.
>
> In my opinion of this case, "should not" means that it will not works
> as expected with current codes.
>
> Currently, with following dependency:
>  xulrunner192>=1.9.2.17nb2
>  xulrunner192<2
>
> As first dependency, xulrunner192-2.0 may be installed,
> and it will mismatch with second dependency, so it will
> be failed to install.

Multiple >= conditions and logical AND between them exist for years
in [BUILD_]DEPENDS.
The same should be true for >= and < conditions.
Single >=|>|<|<= is enough.