Re: bulk vs. options vs. buildlink

[d.den.brok%uni-bonn.de@localhost]

d.den.brok%uni-bonn.de@localhost <d.den.brok%uni-bonn.de@localhost> schrieb:
> However, future care would be required when adding optional
> dependencies to built-in packages. The second approach appears
> safer but might be complicated, as one would have to make sure that
> dependencies of built-ins also appearing as true dependencies are
> buildlinked.
>

BTW, do indirect dependencies need to be buildlinked at all, as
seems to be the case at the moment?

(mk/bsd.buildlink3.mk iterates over _BLNK_PACKAGES, which contains
direct and indirect dependencies.)

TIA,

Dennis den Brok