Re: mailman and binary paths

[Hauke Fath <hauke%Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE@localhost>]

At 23:20 Uhr +0100 7.12.2009, Filip Hajny wrote:
>On 7.12.2009, at 22:51, Hauke Fath wrote:
>
>> Hm - any reason not to go through mailwrapper(8), so that people using
>> other MTAs are covered, too?
>
>This is not a question of MTAs here. The ways how to use Mailman with
>different MTAs are documented on their site, and the two Postfix-related
>config values mentioned here only apply if you pick Postfix *and* want to
>go the "add each list to Postfix aliases" approach (of the three existing
>ways).

Ah, okay. I guess it's been a while since I last messed with Mailman.

        hauke


--
"It's never straight up and down"     (DEVO)