On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 06:06:11PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote: [...] > Opinions? I don't think that kind of stuff kind be automated in a really sane way. There will be use cases that will slip through eventually, and the pain will only be relocated. I have an alternative policy to suggest. It would definitely solve that particular issue, and it is a lot simpler to implement. Never, ever, make PKGREVISION go back, no matter if any other piece of the package name and version changes. Reveision bumps don't happen that frequently, and if a year from now a few packages reach nb100, then so what? Who cares? -- Quentin Garnier - cube%cubidou.net@localhost - cube%NetBSD.org@localhost "See the look on my face from staying too long in one place [...] every time the morning breaks I know I'm closer to falling" KT Tunstall, Saving My Face, Drastic Fantastic, 2007.
Description: PGP signature