Re: audit-packages.conf vs. pkg_install.conf for IGNORE_URLS ?

To: pkgsrc devel <tech-pkg%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: audit-packages.conf vs. pkg_install.conf for IGNORE_URLS ?
From: Nicolas Joly <njoly%pasteur.fr@localhost>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 21:20:42 +0200

On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 09:09:30PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 04:35:38PM +0200, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> > I just noticed that vulnerability check message states that
> > IGNORE_URLS should be set in audit-packages.conf, but shouldn't it be
> > pkg_install.conf instead ?
> 
> Fixed.

Thanks.

-- 
Nicolas Joly

Biological Software and Databanks.
Institut Pasteur, Paris.

References:
- audit-packages.conf vs. pkg_install.conf for IGNORE_URLS ?
  - From: Nicolas Joly
- Re: audit-packages.conf vs. pkg_install.conf for IGNORE_URLS ?
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: audit-packages.conf vs. pkg_install.conf for IGNORE_URLS ?
Next by Date: Re: tar usage in pkgsrc
Previous by Thread: Re: audit-packages.conf vs. pkg_install.conf for IGNORE_URLS ?
Next by Thread: You Have Won
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index