[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Licence handling: next steps
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:47:17PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> I don't like this syntax. Can we please make it
> (a) explicit
> (b) support ()
> (c) Spell them out instead of using weired symbols?
You mean something like:
LICENSE= (license1 OR license2) AND license3 AND license4
I personally don't see the benefit, and it goes above my head to write
that in make. If someone else finds it useful, please go ahead and
provide a diff.
> Given that we likely want to bump the required pkg_install, I am more
> than willing to add corresponding evaluation support to pkg_admin.
> It is needed for handling in pkg_add anyway.
Main Index |
Thread Index |