[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Is is time to rename firefox?
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, David Brownlee wrote:
One more pass at this:
- Update www/firefox3 to install 'firefox' link in addition
to firefox3, and add a CONFLICTS for firefox2 and firefox
I think it would only need CONFLICTS for firefox, if you are changing
firefox2 to only install firefox2 binaries... where is the conflict?
Is anyone working on the changes to update firefox2 to 126.96.36.199 + patches
from the freebsd port so that it is not vulnerable? Plus we need the
entry to flag 188.8.131.52 and lower as vulnerable?
- Rename www/firefox to www/firefox2 and have it install firefox2
binaries only and add CONFLICTS for firefox<3
- Update all the everything that currently buildlinks to www/firefox3
to firefox3 in www/firefox if it supports it, or www/firefox2
The intention is to lose www/firefox, so people do not pick it
assuming it is the latest version, instead we will have a firefox3
(pretty much as is now), plus a matching firefox2
David/absolute -- www.NetBSD.org: No hype required --
Main Index |
Thread Index |