tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: is/should send-pr in pkgsrc?

To: tech-pkg%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: is/should send-pr in pkgsrc?
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:56:37 +0100

On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:20:49AM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
> As such, is it worth putting send-pr (or a suitable mutant of it) in the  
> bootstrap setup for non NetBSD systems?

send-pr itself is part of GNATS. I don't think it provides a much nicer
interface than the web frontend (well, both suck), so not sure if
splitting it off would really give much.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: is/should send-pr in pkgsrc?
  - From: David Holland

References:
- is/should send-pr in pkgsrc?
  - From: Carl Brewer

Prev by Date: Re: is/should send-pr in pkgsrc?
Next by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Previous by Thread: Re: is/should send-pr in pkgsrc?
Next by Thread: Re: is/should send-pr in pkgsrc?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index