Re: Loosing mandatory DISTNAME

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 09:56:53PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> Now, all package must define DISTNAME.
> But basicall, some kind of packages require no distfile.
> (meta-package, in-place source, and so on).
> Those packages now define DISTNAME as PKGNAME, empty MASTER_SITES and
> DISTFILES. It is circuitous definition.

Huh? They just set DISTNAME, PKGNAME is derived from that. I don't see
any circular definition.

Joerg