[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: 2008Q1 -> current: downgrade
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 02:56:17PM +0200, Dieter Baron wrote:
> So, Joerg and Al: what are your proposed ways of dealing with the
> problem at hand? Ignore it, and let users sort out the mess on their
> own and by hand? Rename PKGBASE with all the mess and complexity
> (strange name of installed packages, CONFLICTS, handling renames,
> mismatch between PKGPATH and PKGBASE) that means? Any other ideas?
Keep the version numbers in the existing scale? E.g.
foo-20070809.4.5 This is not really more ugly than PKG_EPOCH.
Main Index |
Thread Index |