Subject: Re: NetBSD/usermode
To: Alistair Crooks <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Herb Peyerl <email@example.com>
Date: 12/29/2007 12:20:03
On Dec 29, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 08:45:13PM -0000, De Zeurkous wrote:
>> On Fri, December 28, 2007 19:54, Martijn van Buul wrote:
>>> * De Zeurkous:
>>>> My last message, addressed to firstname.lastname@example.org (and
>>>> properly CC'ed to tech-pkg), evoked the following response:
>>> No, CC'ed to tech-kernel, I have no clue why you decided to bother
>> I don't either. My bad :^) -- the usual excuses apply...
>>>> (reason: 550 5.7.1 Sorry, we do not accept SPAM at invisible.ca.)
>>>> While I may be a flamer and an IRC bot overengineer, I'm not
>>>> exactly a
>>>> spammer. Please fix.
>>> You also complain to the wrong people. You need to talk to the
>>> fine people
>>> at invisible.ca. They're the wrong blocking your message.
>> No. jmcneill should. If it's his server -- can't be bothered to
>> check it
>> right now, I /still/ have a lack of decent sleep on my hands -- he
>> fix it himself; if he uses a third party mail service, he should.
> The Cc: line has not been trimmed. Please feel free to complain
> about it on the Linux kernel mailing list.
> For everyone's information, I asked Jared for the rule which he used
> to block your email, and he told me that he used the following rule:
> /^From:.*@nichten.info/ REJECT Sorry, we do not accept SPAM at
> in the postfix header checks.
I see the problem. This whole thread could have been avoided had
Jared simply had a more informative return message from postfix...
This is what I have:
/^From:.*@nichten.info/ REJECT Sorry, we do not accept mail from trolls.
Hope that helps.
> I know of many other people who prefer to block spam at the MUA level
> using procmail so:
> in .procmailrc.
> PS. For anyone following up, I'd be grateful if you could include
> this email
> in its entirety, please. Thanks in advance.
You're welcome, squire.