Subject: RE: libtool replacement (jlibtool) from devel/apr
To: Blair Sadewitz <>
From: De Zeurkous <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 12/28/2007 06:32:23

On Fri, December 28, 2007 04:03, Blair Sadewitz wrote:
> Personally, I think the C code is easier to read
> than the GNU libtool script.  I figure that
> this could be of benefit in pkgsrc--at least as
> much as anything else that reduces the amount
> of shell code could be. ;)

I presume you mean bad code, full of security holes and 'magic
statements', written by hardcore C programmers in a random, but inept,
shell with proper tools nor question? In that case, I have to agree,
although I'd much rather fix the programmers in question instead.


De Zeurkous

Friggin' Machines!

> Regards,
> --Blair

# Proud -net.kook- IRC bot overengineer
% NetBSD, zsh, twm, nvi and roff junkie
From the fool file:
I don't see why the way people have historically partitioned disks should
dictate which kernels we build and distribute by default in the future.
        --Darren Reed (, NetBSD tech-kern