Subject: Re: lost history of patches (was Re: qemu patches to upstream)
To: NetBSD Packages Technical Discussion List <>
From: Klaus Heinz <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 12/06/2007 20:37:09
Malcolm Herbert wrote:
> would it be worth implementing something similar to the vulnerabilities 
> file - ie, a monotonically increasing file of 
>   group/package version patchfile description

I do not see any need for a centrally managed file with this kind of
content. Comments and names of patch files only concern the package at
hand so I think they should be local to that package.