On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:09:58AM +0000, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:57:24PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > I'm sorry but I think this is awkward. If we decided to branch over
> > > to the "xcursor" package we should stick with that decision and
> > > not simply change our mind and use "libXcursor" instead.
> > 
> > As Jeremy wrote -- libXcursor is the successor of the xcursor package
> > and xcursor is just archaic.
> 
> Can "libXcursor" be used on a XFree86 system?

With the builtin.mk magic for the dependencies, yes. E.g. builtin.mk
would have to create fake .pc files.

Joerg