Subject: Re: New value for "X11_TYPE"
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Matthias Scheler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/27/2007 20:46:34
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 07:27:14PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> 2) X11_TYPE=native and system has xcursor included ->
> x11/xcursor/builtin.mk skips the dependency.
> 3) X11_TYPE=native and system has no xcursor -> x11/xcursor is the
> With the change, libXcursor is used directly iff there's no native
I'm sorry but I think this is awkward. If we decided to branch over
to the "xcursor" package we should stick with that decision and
not simply change our mind and use "libXcursor" instead.
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/