Subject: Re: option in gnome-base to avoid smb?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/05/2007 09:44:26
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 02:48:34PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I thought that objection might arise, and I can sort of see the point.
> Do you have a proposal for how to accomodate someone who wants to avoid
> samba being built/installed but does want (or at least not object to)
> 99% of gnome-base?
Do you object to the full samba or to smb support at all? It might be a
good idea to split samba and the libraries for other programs and the
daemon/tools similiar to what we have for openldap. That should make it
a lot less heavy as dependency as well.