Subject: Re: Missing licenses
To: Martti Kuparinen <email@example.com>
From: Greg Troxel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/31/2007 17:02:33
Martti Kuparinen <email@example.com> writes:
> Greg Troxel wrote:
>> Shouldn't copies of all licenses be in pkgsrc/licenses?
> Is it okay to commit, i.e. do we agree with these names? Do we need LGPL 2.1?
> n39:/usr/pkgsrc/licenses> cvs update
> A gnu-gpl-v2
> A gnu-gpl-v3
> A gnu-lgpl-v2
> A gnu-lgpl-v2.1
> A gnu-lgpl-v3
That looks like very useful progress to me. I don't know if LGPL 2.1 is
really needed, but it seems likely that one of our pacakges uses it, and
you've already done the work, so sure, include it. We have 88 licenses
now, and it's probably going to 120 with the free ones, so one more
doesn't hurt much.