Subject: Re: Missing licenses
To: Martti Kuparinen <email@example.com>
From: Greg Troxel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/30/2007 12:24:01
> And, secondly, why is it GNU-GPL-v, the "GNU-" bit is
> unnecessary. Or maybe we should call the BSD ones
It's necessary and correct. GPL stands for General Public License. The
FSF includes GNU when describing it; see the title on
Shouldn't copies of all licenses be in pkgsrc/licenses?
And I think we aren't yet adding uncommented LICENSE= tags to packages
for free licenses.