Subject: RE: Outdated ion3 pkgsrc in violation of the license
To: Mark Weinem <email@example.com>
From: De Zeurkous <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/29/2007 11:19:46
On Mon, October 29, 2007 10:54, Mark Weinem wrote:
> Hi De Zeurkous,
>> You're only confirming the validity of his point here by taking
>> offence from a simple request which should have been anticipated
>> while reading the license. You quote some random bitch fight on the
>> issue, but (conveniently?) forget that a simple rename would have
>> been enough to statisfy his requirements, /as stated in the
>> conversation you quoted/.
> Imposing to play kindergarten games (renaming!) on the pkgsrc
> maintainers and developers?
He's not imposing anything on anyone. In this case, importing Ion3 into
pkgsrc using this particular method implies agreement with it's license.
Of course, we could escalate this into the ethical discussion it's
supposed to be, but then we're just trolls, right?
> Just because of someones idiosyncrasies??
Or the idiosyncracies of a particular group?
> Tuomo's attitudes towards users and developers of opensource software
> are known, his unkindliness as well. Please do some research.
Ehrm, I've not contested any such facts?
> Regards, Mark