Subject: RE: Outdated ion3 pkgsrc in violation of the license
To: Geert Hendrickx <email@example.com>
From: De Zeurkous <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/29/2007 08:36:20
On Mon, October 29, 2007 08:05, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 06:16:05PM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote:
>> On 2007-10-28 18:12:00 (+0100), Philip Paeps <email@example.com> wrote:
> Anyway, I think he's being unreasonable. Even if I had committed this
> "on time", a next one would have been too late. The guy just seems to
> have a
> problem with packagers in general.
Does having a problem with 'packagers in general' -- one that I personally
share, although I'll be the first to acknowledge the necessity of package
systems -- make a person unreasonable?
> He has even threatened with legal
> against some[*]. That's not someone I want to deal with, and others here
> expressed similar opinions.
You're only confirming the validity of his point here by taking offence
from a simple request which should have been anticipated while reading the
license. You quote some random bitch fight on the issue, but
(conveniently?) forget that a simple rename would have been enough to
statisfy his requirements, /as stated in the conversation you quoted/.
> [*] http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/tur-users/2007-April/004634.html