On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Greg Troxel wrote:

>   We don't rename on branches, do we? :-)
>  
> That should be indeed be prohibited, and I think it already is.
> 
> But someone needs to be able to update from one branch to the next, and
> having CHANGES from head should work fine for that.

I don't think having the recent CHANGES file downloaded in addition to 
pkg_summary files for binary-only users is good enough -- since the 
CHANGES files is only for the one year. Unless we plan to make it so all 
CHANGES-* files are available.

  Jeremy C. Reed