Subject: Re: why apache-2.x is not apache2-2.x? (fwd)
To: None <reed@reedmedia.net>
From: Takahiro Kambe <taca@back-street.net>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 09/20/2007 00:10:56
Hi,

In message <Pine.NEB.4.64.0709190917170.28954@glacier.reedmedia.net>
	on Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:20:22 -0500 (CDT),
	"Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net> wrote:
> It seems to me that this should be:
> 
> apache-1.3.37nb2.tgz (or apache1-1.3.37nb2.tgz)
> apache2-2.0.59nb6.tgz
> apache22-2.2.4nb6.tgz (or my preference apache2.2-2.2.4nb6.tgz)
If these package could be installed at the same time, I think these
changes of PKGBASE worthwhile.  But if not, it cause adding more
CONFLICTS lines to Makefiles.

This is my trivial view.

Best regards.

-- 
Takahiro Kambe <taca@back-street.net>