Subject: Re: pkgsrc to replace build.sh
To: Adam Hamsik <email@example.com>
From: Matt Fleming <mjf@NetBSD.org>
Date: 08/30/2007 10:15:56
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[Just for the record I'm in favour of this general idea]
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:51:22AM +0200, Adam Hamsik wrote:
> 1) we strongly integrate pkgsrc and netbsd I think that keep them more
> separate is better for portability and also for netbsd users(because they
> don't need to use pkgsrc if they want to upgrade their system).
> 2)What about other supported operating systems mostly Dfbsd,Solaris?
I'm not sure why netbsd source being strongly integrated with pkgsrc
would be a problem, I mean, the source is strongly dependent upon
build.sh code now.
The idea of being able to install a prebuilt kernel via pkg_add seems
really cool to me, epsecially if that machine is just tracking security
criticial updates, etc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----