Subject: Re: pkgsrc to replace build.sh
To: Adam Hamsik <haaaad@gmail.com>
From: Matt Fleming <mjf@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 08/30/2007 10:15:56
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

[Just for the record I'm in favour of this general idea]

On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:51:22AM +0200, Adam Hamsik wrote:
> Cons:
> 1) we strongly integrate pkgsrc and netbsd I think that keep them more 
> separate is better for portability and also for netbsd users(because they 
> don't need to use pkgsrc if they want to upgrade their system).
> 2)What about other supported operating systems mostly Dfbsd,Solaris?
>

I'm not sure why netbsd source being strongly integrated with pkgsrc
would be a problem, I mean, the source is strongly dependent upon
build.sh code now.

The idea of being able to install a prebuilt kernel via pkg_add seems
really cool to me, epsecially if that machine is just tracking security
criticial updates, etc.

- --mjf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBRtaKzK3y1f69VxYbAQJdtgf7BQOA8IyOl0gZGlyEDHuVKG/kYOyXNyrN
x3PxXvlLa/XMXItYFdP5VO0M59r8UTig9LZxFDTHIii/SBK9g4XXRQ9B3EAKQwG/
fjYg7KHxxHIafcwybwiZY0kTF941asZ+nouRk6a3tVYPGnKnE13o4tE+y1CbOJBT
adodpl7LbzM8q0m0J9X0vLS4QC2R1UfR8KquuZG/cI8KFucX3RWbzbEX/MW0s/Bp
K4o0HdHds8pJnwYrmP+eY5bqHvFB/CuyTppHmPq1bG6A5GkGEszvow/kPQtnjfLJ
pmXByHts1s5J1eUJQsssxTpOS7R36hWTYdQF0MuAH54swUIUhplcrw==
=NyXD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----